Federal Judge orders in favour of Netflix and Hulu against Tax Lawsuit

Table of contents [hide]

Share

Streaming services are replacing traditional cable at a much faster pace. It is no surprise that they’re taking away a beefy cut from the local authorities’ tax revenue. Last week a Federal Judge ordered in favor of Netflix and Hulu against a lawsuit filed by the southwestern Arkansas town of Ashdown. The suit by the state claimed that these online streaming services owed money to Ashdown. The logic being the use of broadband infrastructure that used the public right-of-way.

Netflix and HULU Tax Lawsuit

Read More: Richer information card of your contacts in the sidebar for Google Chat, Calendar, Docs, and more

It is a fact that municipalities across the nation have lost revenue in the form of tax as more and more consumers are switching to these online streaming platforms. This should have put the load on these local governments especially considering the losses due to COVID-19. These governments used to charge traditional cable as they were providing land and infrastructure for these cable providers. In the end, however, these added fees and chargers came in the form of indirect tax on the consumers.

Netflix, Hulu, and the Lawsuit

The order reminded the town of the 2013 Video Service Act of the state. The Video Service Act gave the video service providers the power to avoid negotiations with every political subdivision served by their networks for separate authorization. Judge Susan Hickey also said that the Court agrees to the analogy offered by Hulu. Hulu said whether a driver locks the car doors while driving does not affect whether the road taken is public.

Other states across the nation have also filed similar lawsuits. These states deem it necessary to impose a tax on streaming services and other similar online platforms. The ones that are somehow connected to the local infrastructure. While many would argue against the need for restraining social media platforms and streaming services, laws are necessary to restrict the misuse of these new platforms. Especially in times when Whistleblowers are telling us what these platforms truly need. Facebook, for example, let the users spread hate speech even though they say they’re doing their best to constrain them. 

Also Read: How To Use the Google Chrome Web Feed

Even though Netflix and Hulu scored this time, streaming services as a whole might not have a great time ahead. As we said, other states are trying to tax these services in any way possible. The involvement of Texas, Nevada, Ohio, Tennessee, Indiana, and Georgia might mean a final decision from the Supreme Court would be needed to end the conflict. Like before, if it’s not in favor of these streaming services, the customers would be the ones who’d have to pay.

Share

Fausaan C M
Fausaan C M
Actively contributed on GChromecast Hub for a couple of years. He's well-versed in technology and now works for a MNC.

Read more

Related News

Warner Bros. Launches Max Streaming service in Australia

Warner Bros. Discovery is committed to making its streaming service Max a global powerhouse. Max streaming service is now live in Australia. Earlier it...

Acer launches 5 New Chromebook Plus models along a Tab

Acer quietly unveiled the 5 new Chromebook Plus models and a Chromebook tablet. Acer already announced the Chromebook Tab 311 in BETT 2025, formerly...

Xiaomi TV Box S (3rd Gen) Unveiled: Powerful Processor & Enhanced Features

Xiaomi revealed its next streaming TV box on its global website. The name of a new streaming box is Xiaomi TV Box S (3rd...

Thomson Streaming Box Plus 270 runs on Google TV Launched in Europe

Thomson launched the new 4K Streaming Box Plus 270 based on Google TV launched in Europe. It will give tough competition to Google TV...