Federal Judge orders in favour of Netflix and Hulu against Tax Lawsuit

Share

Streaming services are replacing traditional cable at a much faster pace. It is no surprise that they’re taking away a beefy cut from the local authorities’ tax revenue. Last week a Federal Judge ordered in favor of Netflix and Hulu against a lawsuit filed by the southwestern Arkansas town of Ashdown. The suit by the state claimed that these online streaming services owed money to Ashdown. The logic being the use of broadband infrastructure that used the public right-of-way.

netflix and hulu tax lawsuit

Read More: Richer information card of your contacts in the sidebar for Google Chat, Calendar, Docs, and more

It is a fact that municipalities across the nation have lost revenue in the form of tax as more and more consumers are switching to these online streaming platforms. This should have put the load on these local governments especially considering the losses due to COVID-19. These governments used to charge traditional cable as they were providing land and infrastructure for these cable providers. In the end, however, these added fees and chargers came in the form of indirect tax on the consumers.

Netflix, Hulu, and the Lawsuit

The order reminded the town of the 2013 Video Service Act of the state. The Video Service Act gave the video service providers the power to avoid negotiations with every political subdivision served by their networks for separate authorization. Judge Susan Hickey also said that the Court agrees to the analogy offered by Hulu. Hulu said whether a driver locks the car doors while driving does not affect whether the road taken is public.

Other states across the nation have also filed similar lawsuits. These states deem it necessary to impose a tax on streaming services and other similar online platforms. The ones that are somehow connected to the local infrastructure. While many would argue against the need for restraining social media platforms and streaming services, laws are necessary to restrict the misuse of these new platforms. Especially in times when Whistleblowers are telling us what these platforms truly need. Facebook, for example, let the users spread hate speech even though they say they’re doing their best to constrain them. 

Also Read: How To Use the Google Chrome Web Feed

Even though Netflix and Hulu scored this time, streaming services as a whole might not have a great time ahead. As we said, other states are trying to tax these services in any way possible. The involvement of Texas, Nevada, Ohio, Tennessee, Indiana, and Georgia might mean a final decision from the Supreme Court would be needed to end the conflict. Like before, if it’s not in favor of these streaming services, the customers would be the ones who’d have to pay.

Fausaan C M
Fausaan C M
Actively contributed on GChromecast Hub for a couple of years. He's well-versed in technology and now works for a MNC.

Read more

Local News

Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro launched with Tensor G4 SoC, pricing starts from $799

Google launches its flagship Pixel 9 series smartphones today. The Google Pixel 9 Series includes the Pixel 9, Pixel 9 Pro, Pixel 9 Pro...

Google TV Streamer vs Apple TV, which is better?

Recently, the search engine giant launched Google TV Streamer 4K. It replaces the decade old Chromecast with Google TV. Google TV Streamer 4K will...

Google TV Streamer 4K launched with $99.99 price tag, replaces Chromecast

Google today launched its latest streaming device called "Google TV Streamer". Now, the company officially replaces the Chromecast with Google TV with the new...

All new Table-Top streaming device reportedly called “Google TV Streamer”, Launch expected soon

Since late last year, there are some leaks and rumors about the Google's new streaming device. Till now Google's only streaming device is Chromecast....